Critters as Metaphor
Monday, January 9th, 2012
DART BEAGLE!
It’s happened AGAIN.
That would be the way my work with critters habitually turns into metaphor for my writing.
While I could be talking about the incredible icy poo-fest that is the barn frontage this particular winter (in fact, given the state of the industry, I probably should be talking about the incredible icy poo-fest that is the barn frontage this particular winter), I’m somehow not.
It’s about tracking, really. And how being on the end of the tracking line is a whole lot like wrangling the muse.
Every dog has a different style when tracking, but staying on the track is the only way to get the job done. Enticing crosstracks won’t do it. Following that just-flushed jackrabbit won’t do it, either. Following blown scent instead of the actual track isn’t going to get you there, or getting stuck in scent pools won’t get you anywhere at all.
It’s up to the handler to question the dog, create a thoughtful process, and not follow blindly where the dog leads. After all, if you step out confidently when the dog is merely pondering a crosstrack, then the dog may well rightfully think, “Ah HA! She wants me to go this way!”
And yes, a writer needs to stay on track. Both with editorial expectations (some publishers more than others) and with storytelling needs. As in, there are certain necessary elements for a good story, no matter how many individual ways there are to approach those elements.
At the same time, the handler has to trust the dog. No human can detect the scent the dog follows; only the dog can say where the track goes. And while the handler employs an understanding of scent behavior and dog body language to know when to follow freely and when to wait and watch and stay out of the way and when to say, “Are you sure?”, at some point you simply have to trust. And if you don’t–if you start questioning and hesitating in that moment you should be trusting…then the dog loses confidence. Shuts down. Quits.
It’s just the same with writers, right? A writer needs to follow her muse. Restrain the muse, and she shuts down. Tell her no too many times and she flips you a rude gesture. Ignore her insight, and go down a duller, well-trodden path instead of managing a bright new track through unexplored territory.
Add it all up and it becomes a dance. Knowing enough about the territory and conditions and expectations–not to mention the muse or the dog–to provide the necessary guidance. And then, knowing when to just plain trust, even if the track goes in an unexpected direction.
See? Is that totally a tracking as writing metaphor, or what?





This weekend, the Beagles went flying.
Normally these three qualifying runs would have earned him a title–and I thought it had. Then I remembered that it takes three legs under TWO different judges, and at this particular trial there was only one judge. (It’s quite unusual just for that reason.) We’re traveling for the next trial, which may or may not explode his brain. We shall have to see!



